Discussion:
My experience with upgrading from RH9 to FC1
Gerard Milmeister
2003-11-06 20:07:49 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

I just upgraded from RedHat9 to Fedora Core 1.
The upgrade itself was easy. However I didn't
meet the package selection in the installer...
Did I simply miss the option?
These are the issues I encountered:
1. I had to install the following drivers:
a) proprietary NVIDIA
b) bcm4400 for the network card
c) alsa
At first it didn't work at all, then I noticed
that I must use gcc32 to compile, this wasn't
very clear from the release notes.
I had a problem with compiling the alsa driver
(schedule_work), but google groups was my friend.
BTW before trying to fix alsa, I tried sndconfig,
which detected the onboard soundcard before my
SB Live!. I would have preferred to choose the
order the soundcards are configured.
2. At first starting, the GNOME desktop was in
a mess. I moved .gnome2 out of the way.
I previously always used sawfish, but that didn't
work at all. The background was gray overlaying
the Nautilus icons. So I installed metacity.
However I prefer sawfish, because it allows better
control of window placement.
I have two screens configured with Xinerama. The first
screen is 1600x1200, the second 1280x01024. With Gnome 2.2
and Sawfish, I could place a panel at the bottom of the
second screen. This I can no longer do. I can place a
panel at the top and at the right, but not at the bottom.
(BTW I miss the rounded edges of the menu panel :-(

Well that's all for now. Otherwise FC1 is fine.
Thanks
--
Gérard Milmeister
Tannenrauchstrasse 35
8038 Zürich
***@bluewin.ch
Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-11-06 20:18:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gerard Milmeister
a) proprietary NVIDIA
b) bcm4400 for the network card
^^^^^^^

forget that and use _tg3_ driver.
--
HTML mails are going to trash automagically
Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-11-06 20:23:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Xose Vazquez Perez
Post by Gerard Milmeister
a) proprietary NVIDIA
b) bcm4400 for the network card
^^^^^^^
forget that and use _tg3_ driver.
it's _b44_ driver, tg3 is for others bcm NICs. Sorry.
--
HTML mails are going to trash automagically
Gerard Milmeister
2003-11-06 20:35:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Xose Vazquez Perez
Post by Xose Vazquez Perez
Post by Gerard Milmeister
a) proprietary NVIDIA
b) bcm4400 for the network card
^^^^^^^
forget that and use _tg3_ driver.
it's _b44_ driver, tg3 is for others bcm NICs. Sorry.
Thanks, that works.
--
Gérard Milmeister
Tannenrauchstrasse 35
8038 Zürich
***@bluewin.ch
Charles R. Anderson
2003-11-07 00:30:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Xose Vazquez Perez
Post by Xose Vazquez Perez
forget that and use _tg3_ driver.
it's _b44_ driver, tg3 is for others bcm NICs. Sorry.
But don't use tg3 for BCM 57xx cards. It drops packets under load,
where bcm5700 driver does not. Can we get bcm5700.o (which is GPL)
integrated?

http://www.broadcom.com/support/downloaddrivers.php

We've been happily using 7.0.0 on a couple Dell 2650's without
problems, and Snort is much happier.
--
Charles R. Anderson <***@wpi.edu> / http://angus.ind.wpi.edu/~cra/
PGP Key ID: 49BB5886
Fingerprint: EBA3 A106 7C93 FA07 8E15 3AC2 C367 A0F9 49BB 5886
Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-11-07 00:46:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Charles R. Anderson
But don't use tg3 for BCM 57xx cards. It drops packets under load,
where bcm5700 driver does not.
which is tg3 release ?
Post by Charles R. Anderson
Can we get bcm5700.o (which is GPL) integrated?
NOOOO, please. bcm5700 code is shit. Yes, it works but it's shit.
--
HTML mails are going to trash automagically
Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-11-07 12:48:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Charles R. Anderson
But don't use tg3 for BCM 57xx cards. It drops packets under load,
where bcm5700 driver does not.
which is tg3 release ?
Post by Charles R. Anderson
Can we get bcm5700.o (which is GPL) integrated?
NOOOO, please. bcm5700 code is shit. Yes, it works but it's shit.
--
HTML mails are going to trash automagically
Loading...